Abiodun Adeyemi Mohammed Ajijola

 For lovers of decorum and humane lifestyle. It has become unequivocally clear in recent weeks and months that there is a deliberate and consistent effort to make Noise look really bad by some people who ironically make the most Noise especially intentionally. This is the real irony. What me who write this physically have observed in recent weeks and months is a concerted effort to punish arbitrarily with all sorts of punishments including what could not even be described as punishment but plain aggression and cruelty all in the Name of Noise. What is very clear is that those doing this are actually seeking to blackmail Noise by first making ridiculous amounts if it or making it in such as way that would cause frustration and then using the discomfort from that to impose very strict conditions many times involving spiritual killings on a person who has been frustrated by their genuine Noise. This is an attempt to make trying to request reasonable use of Noise seem bad. Those doin...

THE FOLLOWING IS PURELY FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES AND NOT TO PLACE SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON ANY SIDE IN THE RWANDAN GENOCIDE OF 1994 AND THE RWANDAN WAR FROM 1990 TO 1994.  The purpose of this write up is to compare the differences in the approach of the Hutus and Tutsis during the genocide and after the genocide and to see if that may have had any impact on the outcome of the genocide and the Rwandan War from 1990 to 1994. This is purely for educational studies purposes. Hutus 1. The Hutus are the significant majority of the Rwandan population. Therefore the Hutu have the democratic advantage in any election even if it is free, fair and credible. Therefore opting for violence when a people have the larger numbers significantly really doesn't make sense. All that is needed is the conduct of a free and fair election that meets international standards. Any other ethnic group that wants to win election would have to convince the Hutu for support because they have the numbers. This way th...