MDA005225012026 Sunday 25th January 2026 MOBILE DEVICE ATTACK

MDA005225012026

Sunday 25th January 2026

MOBILE DEVICE ATTACK 

Another very serious attack is a physical technological attack on my mobile device. This frustrates my using my mobile device especially while working, listening to programmes for instance. On Sunday 25th January 2026 there were no less than 644 disruptions in the use of my mobile device using some external technological and or physical means. This is not only a gross contravention of my fundamental Human rights it is also expressly illegal and unconstitutional.

This is a serious crime and illegality and those perpetuating this illegality need to be made known legally and accurately in timely manner. 

Me who write this physically need increased protection from this illegality.

Things that were done are as below:

Disruptions in the use of my mobile phone - 50

Deleted words in the use of my phones - 500

Intentional deletion of text. 

Intentional typing of text. 

Illegal and compulsory verification of Election Monitor on Sunday 25th January 2026.

https://x.com/electmonitorng/status/2015321036254859278?t=SPijkmkkrRfVkPFZbmUMQw&s=19

INTENTIONAL ATTEMPTS TO PREVENT A RECOMMENDATION

There was some considerable malfeasance, wrongdoing and illegality by the hackers and rogue security agents intended to prevent a recommendation that me who write this physically took some hours to write. 

First, is deleting an entire set of addresses saved in drafts and intended for posting a recommendation. This was done while me who write this physically slept off for some minutes on the chair where me who write this physically was writing the recommendation.

'The Twitter addresses for the recommendation posted at 5.31pm were saved in drafts of the Twitter but not there when me who write this physically  wanted to post at 5.18pm.

This caused a time delay.'

https://x.com/electmonitorng/status/2015463747158986827?t=LyDa92nySI7SyzNxp-aYOA&s=19

Second, is the changing of a capital letter to a lower case letter at an address which was to be used for the same recommendation. This shows that even if the lower case letter was typed it would still give an upper case outcome.

https://x.com/electmonitorng/status/2015464485151027653?t=Rdtr-jUyNHoU_lBwn7ymYQ&s=19

Third, the word ARTIFICIAL was written by me who write this physically using the clavier but a single letter was removed by hackers and rogue security agents. The challenge with this word with a deleted letter would mean that the correct word written above did not show or was not selected. That is not the situation. In addition, the video shows that immediately after the word ARTIFICIAL was typed, the word INTELLIGENCE followed immediately. If the other word was typed, as the hackers and rogue security agents are trying to imply, howcome the word INTELLIGENCE is sequenced immediately after it, which is exactly how me who write this physically typed it a number of times. If it is said that, that was from a prior typing some time ago, then the correct spelling of ARTIFICIAL as shown in this section should have also shown from the first three letters typed instead of the word with a letter omitted. This is an observation.

Fourth, was the name Stanford. The hackers and rogue security agents wanted to try to show that the word Stanford was not typed by me other than in the Twitter address @Stanford. This is because me who write this physically checked the Twitter address after searching for it so they knew that adjusting that may be easier to detect their nefarious actions. Therefore, it is my strong opinion that the hackers and rogue security agents deleted the word Stanford without the @ sign from the prediction so that it would not show. This would make it appear as though it were never typed in the first place. This was the specific intent of the hackers and the rogue security agents. Since the spelling of the word was different, it did not show how it could be proven that me who write this physically actually typed the word Stanford without the @ sign. This is a situation of intentional removal of evidence to try to implicate an innocent individual. However, as it stands, me who write this physically checked the Twitter address of Stanford, which could be legally and accurately proven in the search engine. This made it clear that me who write this physically had indeed typed the word Stanford while preparing the recommendation, which is what the hackers and rogue security agents did not want to be acknowledged.

https://x.com/electmonitorng/status/2015574592820031597?t=30QZn1oblRKr09k8dB2ZHg&s=19

Another very important aspect was intense psychological pressure attacks for hours by the hackers and rogue security agents, especially from prior to 12am till after 4am this morning 26th January 2026. There were such psychological pressure attacks almost all through the preparation of the recommendation on Sunday 25th January 2026, which is the situation with almost every recommendation written by me who write this physically in recent years. These psychological pressure attacks caused me a biological headache and serious discomfort. This is practical torment and almost every day for sometime using my phone has been arduous as some of my legal rights as a user of telecommunications services have been violated and contravened quite regularly. 

SOME DAMAGES TO SOME OF MY MOBILE PHONES 

There have been two more intentional black markings made on my phone. This was observed conclusively on Wednesday 21st January 2026. - 2

There have been two intentional black markings made on my phone. This was observed on Tuesday 6th January 2026. - 2

https://abiodunamajijola.blogspot.com/2025/12/some-damages-to-some-of-my-mobile-phones.html

This crime needs to be legally determined to the source of the crime and legally prevented from attacking my mobile device forthwith.

Me who write this physically have the legal right to use my mobile devices with adequate legal protection. 

DEFINITION

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Malicious prosecution is knowingly and with malicious intent initiating litigation against another.

SAYING NO IN MY BRAIN 

Person saying NO in my brain from left adjacent compound when looking at the front entrance of this compound from inside this compound. This is not allowing me to think. This is illegal and very inhumane. This is precarious to my mental health. This sounds like a tape or audio recording.

Written by Abiodun Mohammed Adeyemi Ajijola